The lens of literature

I went through a very confusing time once in my life. My thoughts were a jigsaw puzzle, my emotions a mess. Then one day someone gave me a book. When I started reading the book, the waters miraculously stilled.

The book’s content was not particularly related to my personal problems. But the story did offer a structure for the assorted pieces of the character’s life. Somehow, as I progressed through the book, through a mysterious process of the human mind, the elements of story started to order my outlook, giving form to my thoughts and a newfound sense of cohesion to my existence.

Then I lost the book.

I probably left it sitting on a bench or something. But when I lost the book, the glass menagerie in my mind came crashing down. Eventually I did climb out of the rut, and some time later I even stumbled across another copy at the half-price bookstore. It’s still on my bookshelf to this day.

I’ve had time to reflect on that mysterious process of the human mind that appropriated the character’s well-ordered narrative to, temporarily, clean up my mess. Fiction, I’ve come to see, is an act of empathy. It puts us in someone else’s shoes. The messes and roadblocks and losses in their life we see in the context of an epic arc that inevitably leads to a cathartic conclusion. If the characters are compelling enough, we can share their emotions. And, through the lens of literature, the epic arc in our own lives begin to pop out from the pages.

It’s a little bit like 3D glasses. When you’re watching the movie without them, everything is fuzzy. When you put them on, however, everything comes into focus. It is an illusion, the clarity is all in your mind, and when the glasses come off, everything is a blur once again.

That’s why I’m so intent on figuring out how to write this story I’ve been working on. I guess I think that if I can figure out the elements of story for my characters that maybe I will be able to perceive the elements of story in my own life – like being able to see a 3D movie – except without the glasses.

Posted in Writing | Leave a comment

The Bible as literature

I typically avoid writing about politics and religion on my blog. But recently, I took a stab at politics and it generated some healthy discourse. So I’ve decided to up the ante and venture into the realm of religion. If you’re offended, please leave a comment!

Remember the day your high school English teacher said that the class would study the Bible as literature? The adolescent atheists were dazed: “why are we studying religious texts in school?” The young Christian zealots were confused: “isn’t the Bible more than merely a piece of literature?”

I admit that I too went through a zealous period in my spirituality. But over the years, as my zeal has waned, my appreciation for literature has waxed. Trust me: classifying the Bible as literature is an enormous compliment for Christians, and I’m convinced the book even has value for non-believing literature lovers. Here’s why.

As any novelist will tell you, creating a compelling story is nothing short of a miracle. You need an interesting premise, an immersive backdrop, intriguing characters, believable bad guys, dialog loaded with whit and wisdom, a plot that isn’t predictable and, most of all, room for the reader’s imagination. Many good stories succeed in some of these areas – a few great stories get them all right.

No matter what your opinion of the Bible is, from a literary point of view it is chocked full of great stories, and foremost among them: the story of Jesus.

The premise is that a child has been conceived out of wedlock, born under auspicious circumstances – whispers of ancient prophecy, diabolical political schemes, visitors from afar, fire in the sky. All this comes at a time of social unrest and political upheaval in the far end of a fringe territory. There are a range of well-rounded characters: the harbinger-hermit, holier-than-thou priests, down-and-out prostitutes, kings and carpenters.

It’s probably too late to lay down a “spoiler alert,” but try thinking about the scriptures as a story. It alternates between progressing the plot and pausing for parables taught by Jesus, riddles that prompt the supporting characters to ask questions that the reader is thinking – but which the author is satisfied to leave not fully answered. The mystery only mounts as the climax approaches, but the reader is now interested in a character-ending. Whether we understand everything or not, we’re dying to find out what becomes of the betrayer, the deserter, the wrongfully accused death-row inmate. And the conclusion even leaves it open for a sequel.

This is such an interesting story because it contains many elements that are remarkably similar to stories that intrigue people today. The miraculously born child, the messianic figure, the hero that had to sacrifice it all – these are all archetypes, or patterns, that in some ways have been part of legend since the beginning of time but were encapsulated in the story of Jesus so well that they have become an indispensable part of literature.

This is not to say the story of Muhammed or the Buddha is any less compelling, I’m just under-qualified to compare them. The point of this article is not to make you believe in the story of Jesus, but to believe in it’s literary merit. And whether you come at if from a secular or spiritual perspective, I think that’s saying quite a lot.

Posted in Perspectives | Leave a comment

What the Future History holds

fhot-teaser-3

Okay, so you’ve been waiting patiently since I mentioned that I’m writing a book to find out what it’s about. Over the last few weeks, I’ve teased you with the title superimposed over obscure transportation-less wastelands. Now I’ve finally worked up the confidence (and word count) to let you in on the secret, the back cover. Here’s what The Future History holds…

In the future, travel is history

In a world where fossil fuels are fast disappearing, an untraveled bookworm hitches a ride with a pair of carbon punks whose nostalgia for the nearly extinct internal combustion engine drives them to the last place where a road trip is still possible, China. But their race to relive the classic road story is thwarted at every turn by the obstacles of an enviropocalyptic dystopia.

Fusing the imaginary voyages of Jules Verne with the introspective journeys of Jack Kerouac, The Future History of Travel is a thought-provoking narrative about the end of the road and what comes next.

Coming soon…

Photo by Adam Gingrich.

Posted in Books | Leave a comment

The separation of church and hate

I think this clip from The Daily Show does a great job of depicting the religious hypocrisy in our society (don’t turn it off at least until you see Sarah Palin!).

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Wish You Weren’t Here
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Tea Party

(If you have trouble viewing the video, click here)

I’m always shocked to hear people claim that Obama is a Muslim. There are two major problems with this: 1) So what if he were a Muslim? Where in our Constitution does it say the President can’t be a Quaker (Nixon) or a Diest (Jefferson) or a Unitarian (Taft) … or, maybe one day, a Muslim? 2) Why do some accuse Obama’s policies of being part of an Islamic conspiracy when he is advocating for nothing different than Democrats before him advocated for? People called Kerry a flip-flopper and Clinton a pimp-daddy … but no one accused these white men of being Muslim. Therefore, when someone claims that Obama, a Christian, is really a Muslim — though he has given them no reason to think that — then the only reasonable explanation is that these people are racist at worst and ignorant at best. It would be like calling Reagan a communist because he embraced diplomacy with Gorbachev — how stupid would that sound? Well you know what, people who are saying such things about Obama sound that stupid.

Posted in Perspectives | Leave a comment

Stick this in your tea bag and suck it

Disclaimer: Please don’t get offended, I love all my readers. This isn’t personal, it’s political. And before you blast me in the the comments, please be sure to read the whole article.

I’m boycotting Fourth of July this year. Instead of BBQ and fireworks, I’ll be dining with my British friends.

Fourth of July has always been my favorite holiday. For me, eating outside on a warm summer night is more appealing than eating inside on a cold winter day, a.k.a. Christmas. But this year, I’m skipping my previously favorite Fourth of July holiday. Why?

You see, I’ve been making a list, checking it twice, trying to figure out whose naughty or nice. And I’m afraid that this year America was naughty.

I’m not talking about the American people. I’ve written on this blog many times before about the importance of distinguishing between a country’s politics and a country’s people. But let’s face it, the Fourth of July is a political affair – it celebrates our system. And it is that system that I have a problem with.

STOP! I know at this point some people are saying: “Tim’s been in China too long, he’s become a communist.” NOT TRUE. Nothing could be farther from the truth. So hold on and let me explain what I mean when I say I have a problem with the system in America.

Our nation has gone through an economic crisis in which eight million people have lost their jobs. We’re currently facing 9.5 percent unemployment (and untold percentage points of underemployment). People want to work and they can’t work – even worse, people are working two and three jobs and still can’t earn a decent wage. But that’s NOT the reason I’m boycotting Fourth of July.

In the midst of such dire straits, Congress has failed to extend unemployment benifits. Even a former McCain economic advisor, Mark Zandi, admits that we need spending on jobs to keep the country out of the tank. And to add insult to injury, Nevada Senate candidate and Tea Party poster child Sharron Angle claims that “You can make more money on unemployment than you can going down and getting one of those jobs that is an honest job but it doesn’t pay as much. We’ve put in so much entitlement into our government that we really have spoiled our citizenry (watch).”

(Fact: First, the average unemployment benefit is just $290 per week. There are nearly five workers actively searching for work for every job available, compared to 1.5 per job opening before the recession began.)

It’s easy to see out-of-touch politicians as a recent phenomena or blame the current predicament on political missteps rather than the culmination of a long-term systemic problem. But if you think back to that first Fourth of July, you’ll find an America whose system has always been indifferent to the underprivileged. The very men who wrote the words, “all men are created equal,” themselves owned slaves. Not domestic workers, but slaves. Those who coined the term, “God-given inalienable rights,” felt that only male citizens should have the right to vote. The “naughty” list goes on and on.

If some of our nation’s past presidents were rulers in today’s world, modern-day Americans would disdain them as despots who don’t respect their citizens’ human rights. Some people say that you can’t judge the actions of historical figures by today’s morals. I would disagree. But when you have the same sort of hypocrisy permeating politics 234 years later, you have to ask yourself: does our country need reform on a more fundamental level? Gradually, America ended slavery, extended voting rights, apologized for treatment of the Native Americans and released Japanese-Americans from war-time internment camps. One day, we’ll also realize that people deserve the opportunity to earn a decent wage and don’t deserve to lose their life-savings just because they get sick.

But why does a system supposedly founded on freedom require reform after reform? Is it that we as a country are somehow predisposed against the underdog (despite our sports habits)? Why does it always take a massive movement to budge the system into helping those in need?

This Fourth of July, as you picnic with friends and family, eat watermelon and watch fireworks – take a minute to notice how many of the things we’re thankful for would not have come about if it were not for the Americans who reformed the system, who amended the Constitution, who challenged the status quo, who stood up and said things need to change.

And then, resolve to never stop changing.

Posted in Perspectives | 1 Comment

Texpo

For anyone who doesn’t already know, the 2010 World Expo (the modern-day equivalent of a World’s Fair) is going on right now in Shanghai.

I recently finished a tour of duty on behalf of my home state, Texas, which held week-long activities at the USA National Pavilion with the goal of attracting tourism and investment to the state. Check out this news clip of Texas at the Expo…

The Expo is supposed to be a place where you can learn more about different cultures and get a glimpse of the future. I’ve talked to Americans who can remember visiting the 1964 World’s Fair in New York when they were children. And now, a whole generation of Chinese kids will carry the global impressions they gained in Shanghai throughout their life.

But my own Expo experience was a little different. I walked away with a deeper appreciation for my own culture and history.

When you grow up somewhere, it’s easy to pass over the truly appreciable things around you. It’s just like the countless Chinese people I’ve met who have never visited the Great Wall while every expat has been more times than he or she can recall. As I listened to the Marshall Ford Swing Band serenade the throngs outside the USA Pavilion and championship trick roper Kevin Fitzpatrick lasso curious Chinese kids, I saw the Texas legend through the eyes of an outsider.

All around, old and young alike squeezed in to hear the music and see a real cowboy. The hats, the boots, the attitude are all iconic. But just think how the influence of traditional Texas culture still reaches our world today, from blue jeans to guitars and, for some, fringe. You can’t understand just how compelling the Texas story is around the world until you’ve seen a crowd of Chinese people tapping their feet to sounds straight outta the hill country.

I’ve always been more of a suburban cowboy myself, and I don’t expect to be sporting cowboy boots anytime soon. But as I write this post, I’m listening to a compilation of Texas musicians. It’s not just country western anymore, but every genre. It reminds me of the taste, vibrance and character that has always been deep in the heart of Texas … and is perhaps one of the few true examples of uniquely American culture. Maybe deep in my genes is still a trace of that quite, rugged, frontiersman.

Ni howdy: http://www.westernshow.org/kevin.fitzpatrick/

Ni howdy: http://www.westernshow.org/kevin.fitzpatrick/

Ya'll listen up now: www.marshallfordswingband.com

Ya'll listen up now: www.marshallfordswingband.com

No country for young men

No country for young men

Posted in Shanghai, China, Texas, U.S.A. | 1 Comment

Conversation killer

Last night I was having an interesting discussion with someone in which I actually felt my mind expand a little. Conversation is interesting when the person you’re talking to really knows what he or she is talking about and can communicate it clearly.

This doesn’t happen too often.

How many times have I failed to make a conversation more interesting? I thought to myself. I made some people laugh, I left some people offended, but did I make anyone think?

I would like this blog to be a conversation. I would like to write you something that I really know about. But too often I’ve descended to posting pictures of poor English translations on signs. Sorry about that.

Two problems with this: first, the things I want to write about are conversation killers: politics, religion, regrets, pet peeves, character flaws. It’s not really safe to write about these things. Talking about it is okay, because you can always deny having ever said it. (I never said that.)

Second, my topics of interest are too random. It doesn’t make sense to have a blog about China, Fringe (TV show), progressive politics, liberal Christianity and the occasional trip to Bali. It’s much safer to do restaurant reviews (buy one get one free burgers at Blue Frog on Mondays!).

Probably its best if I keep the blog politically correct and save the conversation killers for the proper time and place, such as a novel with different totally different names, places and time periods.

Posted in Miscellaneous | Leave a comment

The Future History is coming soon

fhot-teaser-2

I recently put the last few key strokes on the first manuscript of my book. That is not to say it is finished — in many ways the fun is just getting started. Now begins a period of review and revision, editing and soul searching.

About the same time, I stumbled across a document, an initial concept of the story that I jotted down at the beginning of the journey, dated May 10, 2008. So it took me two years (and counting) to carry out this concept. Keep in mind that before I began researching the story, I had to research how to write a book. The heavy writing really didn’t get underway until a year ago.

Since I have a full-time job, this book has been written on weekends, evenings, holidays, train trips and airplane rides … so you’re going to have to excuse me if it’s a little bumpy.

When can you read it? I don’t want to make any promises yet. But rest assured, the Future History is coming soon.

Photo by Adam Gingrich.

Posted in Books | 2 Comments

When “right on red” isn’t right

This article was originally published in the Global Times on May 11, 2010.

rightonredisntright

Illustration by Peter C. Espina

Let’s get one thing clear: This is not an angry rant by a bitter expat. This is not a critique of a sensitive political issue or a particular social ill, nor is it an issue that only affects foreigners – it affects everyone who has ever crossed the street in Beijing on foot.

I am talking about the practice of turning right when the traffic light is red. In traffic terms, it is known as right on red; in real-life terms, it is ridiculous.

Long ago, people realized that when driving on the right side of the road, the car in the right lane can turn right without interfering with cross traffic even when the light is red. The practice is reversed in countries that drive on the left, but the logic remains the same: Why stop and wait at the light when there are no oncoming cars?

Right on red fails to take into account one important factor: pedestrians. In sparsely populated rural areas, the policy makes perfect sense. But in Beijing, it’s an accident waiting to happen, literally.

I spoke to a Beijing police officer about this very issue.

“When should I cross the street?” I asked. “When the light turns green, cars are still coming.”

“You have to pay attention to the light and also watch for cars,” answered the officer.

“So when is the safest time for me to walk across the street?”

“There isn’t a 100 percent safe time to cross the street,” he replied.

Then the officer politely explained to me that, in fact, right on red does have a little-known, seldom-observed provision for pedestrians: Cars in the right lane may turn right at a red light unless there are pedestrians.

I thanked the officer and, carefully, crossed the street. But then I started thinking, when in Beijing are there ever not pedestrians?

Unfortunately too many of Beijing’s spacious sidewalks have been Shanghaied into makeshift parking places for the growing automobile population. Where – and more importantly – when is it safe to walk?

First, we must all recognize that right on red is not suited to a city as crowded as Beijing. That means that drivers need to resist the urge to turn right at red lights – I’m talking about you too motorcycles!

Second, pedestrians must observe the traffic signals and stay within the designated crossings. That means not charging across an intersection just because there are no cars at the moment.

This may seem like a small problem compared to more serious social ills. But with the Shanghai Expo now promoting the concept of “Better City, Better Life,” I can think of few problems that are as simple to fix and which promise such immediate returns in quality of life than everyone deciding that right on red is wrong.

Posted in Articles | 1 Comment

Beach Bali-ball

This is becoming rarer and rarer — a moment in one’s travels when an unspoiled, non-commercialized spectacle of local life is stumbled across. I call it a “National Geographic” moment. It’s something simple and at the same time breathtaking, a product of everyday human life in a culturally relevant package. But it’s not for sale. You just have to be at the right place at the right time.

That would be Sunday evening on Seminyak beach in Bali, Indonesia. With the sun setting, the tide going out and the FIFA World Cup on the horizon, a band of barefoot boys who have probably spent their whole life on the beach play soccer in the surf.

P1000872

P1000875

P1000870

P1000870

P1000878

Posted in Bali, Indonesia, Places | 1 Comment