Journalism goes downstream, digital

paperboy.jpgSome industries use the terms “upstream” and “downstream” to describe their work flow. One example are energy companies. Upstream is oil exploration and off-shore drilling—getting that stuff up from the ground. Downstream is donuts, Slurpees and pay at the pump, getting that stuff in your car.

Journalism has typically been an upstream industry, news gathering. The small tail end of the business model is a kid shouting, “Read all about it,” on the street corner. In other words, we slap all the news on a paper, and it’s your responsibility to come an get it.

That’s changing. With the advent of multimedia-rich, intelligent and cross-platform Internet content—collectively known as Web 2.0—new “news aggregator” Web sites, such as Google News, can sort through the world’s media and deliver stories to your digital doorstep.

It doesn’t stop there. Web sites are increasingly intelligent. Now the news knows you and sorts the stories you want to read. In fact, they sort the stories everyone wants to read, ranking content by popularity to generate digitally democratized headlines.

Where is this taking us? In the past, journalists haven’t had to worry much about marketing their content—names like “New York Times” did that. But with more content than ever—and every bit of it accessible—stories may not be able to rely merely on masthead mandates.

One day, a new breed of downstream journalists may be responsible for seeing that content is propagated across the Internet. Imagine an individual whose job is to follow a news story as it is hyperlinked, “pinged” and passed across news aggregators, bouncing from blog to blog. This individual may get the nickname, “hit man”, for driving up an article’s page rank through views, “diggs” and linked-to comments on related posts.

At least there will be work for all the early-21st Century communication majors.

Check out these must-watch YouTube videos to learn more about Web 2.0 and how it’s changing journalism (Thanks to danwei.org for these links):

Prometeus – The Media Revolution — Will copyright one day be illegal?


2014 EPIC, by Google — What if Google bought Microsoft?


The Machine is Us/ing Us — What is Web 2.0?

Posted in Miscellaneous | 5 Comments

Blog Karma: Comment, comment, comment

monks

In blogging, we’re all blogging Buddhas. Each post, a lifetime. If a posts attracts few comments, I could come back as the Internet equivalent of a grasshopper. If it receives many comments, I can hope to one day reach Nirvana of the Net–a top-ten Google search result.

The key is karma–posting on other people’s blogs. It’s as if the Golden Rule of the blogsphere reads: “Comment on other’s posts as you would have them comment on yours.”

I know you’re out there. You say, “Tim, great blog,” but never leave a comment. Bad blog karma.

Check out how some of the posts below have turned into all-out digital conversations between readers like Ning and Jenny. They’re both Asian, so maybe that’s why they have better blog karma.

It’s really about using the full potential of the blog as a platform for conversation with personal depth and public breadth. Imagine a newspaper where everyone could write a letter to the editor. That’s what this is.

My story, my article, my post–that’s just the beginning of a conversation. You start commenting, adding your opinion, sharing relevant links to other locations on the Web. Video, images, strands from other blogs’ conversations. Send me your honest feedback. If it’s really honest, then use a pseudo name.

The more people contribute, the more people will hear your voice. I’ve been posting on others’ blogs and gotten some pretty good attention. It’s pretty cool.

Make your voice heard about travel, communication and culture. Leave a comment.

Posted in Miscellaneous | Leave a comment

How convenient: An Inconvenient Truth

truthI’m sweating and squinting as I’m typing this post. You see, I’m afraid to turn on the lights or air conditioner because I recently watched An Inconvenient Truth, the documentary film on climate change by “the man who used to be the next president of the United States,” Al Gore.

As you already know, the premise of the film is that the Earth’s climate is warming and human activity is responsible. I know that many people read that and wince. “Al Gore, what a loser!” That’s what I used to say, too. But consider, what does he have to win?

An Inconvenient Truth’s most striking point is not the science but the philosophy. As Gore points out, rising temperatures are on record. What is disputed is humankind’s contribution. Are atmospheric increases in carbon dioxide caused mainly by the burning of fossil fuels such as coal and petroleum–as most scientist believe–or is this just a natural phenomenon–as oil company- and automaker-funded front organizations (and the U.S. congressmen in their coffers) want you to believe?

“It’s hard to make a man believe something when his paycheck depends on him not believing it,” points out Gore.

I’ve heard people say “How can you just believe what some guys stands up there and tells you–when you haven’t even seen it”–and this from church-goers!

I believe that a lot of people have a hard time with this message because they have a hard time with Al Gore. I admit, his presentation skills are still a bit dorky. But if you don’t have your own climate-change lab to check the facts, then check the motives. It’s a convenient way to arrive at the truth–or at least pick sides.

_42091168_kilimanjaro.jpgThere is no environmental lobby. Sure, there are those in Hollywood who throw their purses behind Greenpeace, but you can’t compare that to ExxonMobile’s multi-billion-dollar profit margins. Scientists have only their reputation to loose by being wrong. Exxon, their empire.

Now I like warm weather. So I avoid using the term “global warming,” which sounds pretty attractive at certain months in Beijing. But the film confronts us with photos of melting glaciers, shrinking lakes and a thawing Mt. Kilimanjaro (Hemingway fans shudder).

What I find most moving is not the loss of Polar Bears–though I do worry about Coca-Cola advertisements–but what will happen if ice shelves in Greenland and Antarctica take a plunge. Texas is fine, thankfully. But now that I don’t live in Texas I have to watch the rest of the news, and before my eyes, the Pacific Ocean–with a six-feet rise–swallows Tianjin and Beijing.

Now here’s the part that’s going to move you the most. Another low-lying urban area is Manhattan. Gore points out that Ground Zero, the site of the former World Trade Center, would be completely submerged. “After 9/11, we said we’d never let that happen again,” says Gore. “But did we ever consider that there may be other threats besides terrorism?”

What else can I say? My country has the world’s largest carbon signature and stubbornly refuses to ratify the Kyoto Protocol. How convenient.

inconvenient_truth_300×170.jpg

More information: http://www.climatecrisis.net/

Posted in Miscellaneous | 7 Comments

Beijing gets a heart

heartDrama is good, but most the plays we see are either set an era apart—Oedipus Rex—or involve people dressed as cats. Every once and a while, modern man is treated to a relevant drama, such The Death of a Salesman.

Contemporary comedies and true-to-life tragedies touch us. I Heart Beijing—a one-of-its-kind performance about foreigners, Beijingers and our culturally blurred lives in the Chinese capital—debuted this month.

This is what the box office said:

“Naughty nymphet Ting Ting is a Beijinger by birth but a cosmopolitan girl at heart, she and her headstrong American roommate Sylvia have just moved into an apartment and find themselves host to the antics of their friends; John a womanizing laowai who names all his girlfriends Apple and Lucy a schizophrenic ABC who has an orgasm at the merest of mention of Stephen Colbert’s name. And life in Beijing seems as it should.”

Sitting on the third row last night, I saw that I was watching a satire. Americans, American-born Chinese and Chinese are all at risk of being offended by sitting in the audience (I know because a Chinese was sitting beside me). But everyone is far too busy laughing at each other.

What American hasn’t choked on a chili-spiked eggplant dish? What Chinese hasn’t carried on a phone conversations with only grunting affirmations? We all know what it’s like to say, “But Lonely Planet says…”, “But China is 5,000-years-old…” and “I only taught her English!”

My favorite part was the uniquely “Chinglish” script. Lines like “I’m chiing my fan,” are lingua franca for a lot of foreigners with a few semesters of Chinese under their belt.

play

It started to remind me of Hemingway’s works, a lot of them about Americans’ trans-Atlantic antics. Farewell to Arms: An American student in Italy caught in war. The Sun Also Rises: An American journalist in Spain caught in a bullfight.

I realized that there’s just not enough literature, music, art and drama that deals with Americans caught up in China. A vocabulary is developing among us—still a very small group. Probably for the first time since pre-World War II Shanghai are foreigners and Chinese getting together for more than diplomacy, business or Ping Pong—as I Heart Beijing so accurately shows.

As more and more mixed-up American young people—and their metropolitan Chinese counterparts—start to interact on an interpersonal level—as Americans and Europeans have done for centuries—we’ll need more cultural collateral to help us all interpret each other. We need satire to soothe the culture shock. We need Chinglish to connect the real-life romances. It can’t just all be textbook trips to the Great Wall.

I applaud Elyse Ribbons, the playwright who put this together and portrayed the character of Sylvia herself. You can learn more about I Heart Beijing on the website: www.iheartbeijing.com, and on Elyse’s blog: http://www.iheartbeijing.com/blog.

Posted in Miscellaneous | 1 Comment

Bike 2: Survival of the fittest

bike

My previous post emphasized that bikes are eco-friendly—an evolution in transportation.

I now regret to inform you that this species of cycle is in danger of extinction.

“Bikes: the original eco-friendly” drew a number of comments that pointed out the pitfalls of riding in Beijing, the planet’s bike capital. It seems that cars, trucks, motorcycles—and their tractor-trained drivers—have brought children of the pedal to their final death kneel.

I rode a bike for one week. I rode to and from work—a ten-minute ride. I didn’t know an innocent bystander could get killed this easily outside of Baghdad or certain neighborhoods in Dallas.

One reader commented:

We thought that bike riders looked much more peaceful and happier than the car drivers fighting their ways through traffic jams … until we actually started riding a bike, feeling like running together with giant dinosaurs, naked. It’s weird.

Is this what the Peking man felt like before homo-sapiens took the upper hand? At least a few of them must have been stepped on by mother-loading mammoths. Now, I’m the Beijing man.

On World Bicycle Day, cyclists vividly demonstrate the vulnerability of riders in the fragile ecosystem of earth’s transportation system by stripping down on the street. The reality is that if we don’t cut our carbon emission, we’ll all be naked from the heat of global warming or dead from the war on terror—whichever comes first.

As we approach the Beijing 2008 Olympics, let us turn our attention from the environment to China. I say this as a lover of Chinese culture (after all, I live here). China: you can’t drive. There is a reason that the country with the majority of the world’s bicycles has never won an Olympic medal in cycling (or so I have heard). It is because most the car drivers are newbies, the rest learned to drive on a farm and a sizeable portion of the cycling population is road-rule illiterate.

I don’t claim to be superior. The shear population, the industrialization—it’s truly too much for anyone to handle. And admittedly, Beijing does have a population the size of an Eastern European country. But if people can’t follow the traffic signs, how will they ever learn to see the signs of the times regarding the environment, petropolitics and urbanization?

In the future, cycling—like many things in China—will improve. In the meantime, I’m walking.

Posted in Miscellaneous | Tagged , | 9 Comments

Bike: the original eco-friendly

bike.jpg

我为这辆自行车挺骄傲的。从小到大,我有过三辆。第一辆是我小时候。可是我们美国人十六岁之后就不再骑车。第二辆自行车是我上次来中国的时候买的。二手的自行车——五十块钱。那辆车还可以。最好的地方是我不用怕被偷。

I’m really proud of this bike. Since I was a kid I only had three. The first was when I was young. But in America, after turning 16 we never ride bikes again. The second one I had was after coming to China. It was a second-hand bike–50 RMB (about $6 USD). It was okay. The best part about it was that I didn’t have to worry about it getting stolen.

我上个周末又买了一辆。新的。不过不太贵。
Last week I bought another one. A new one but not too expensive.

我还记得我小时候,老师给我们讲全球变暖。她说我们最好多骑自行车。现在美国的一些环境主义者会这样骑车上下班。可是最大的问题是很多地方是专门为汽车设计的。骑自行车还不太实际。

I still remember when I was young, my teacher taught us about global warming. She said it’s best if we ride bikes all the time. Today, some environmentalists in America are like that, riding bikes to and from work. But the biggest problem is still that many places are especially designed for cars. Riding bikes still isn’t very practical.

我们总是说中国是发展中国家。可是在交通方面已经超过美国了。很可惜,很多中国人不是这样想的。他们想开车。现在车越来越多,堵车也堵得越来越厉害。

We’re always saying China is a developing country. But in the area of transportation it’s already passed America. Unfortunately, many Chinese don’t see it this way. They want to drive. Now there are more and more cars and more and more traffic.

我知道以前中国人骑自行车不是因为帕全球变暖,而是因为中国没有那么多车。不过,因为这个,中国的很多城市——特别是北京,是为自行车设计的。每个地方都有自行车存车处。每条路都有自行车道。很多中国很喜欢车。可是我觉得他们原来骑自行车确实是一个很好的模范。

I know that Chinese used to ride bikes not because they worried about global warming but because there just weren’t that many cars. However, because of this reason, many cities in China–especially Beijing–were designed for bikes. Every place has a bicycle garage. Every road has a bicycle lane. A lot of Chinese people really like cars. But I think the way they used to ride bikes was really a good model for us all.

Posted in 中文 (Chinese) | Tagged , , | 7 Comments

Heavenly peace

Today is the anniversary of nothing.

Posted in Miscellaneous | 3 Comments

Stars in the backyard again

stars

One day I looked out the window and saw a photo shoot going on, again. So what if you can’t see stars in the sky if you meet them next door.

有一天,我看见窗口外又有模特在拍照片。晚上看不见星星没关系。只要和明“星星”做邻居就行。

Posted in 中文 (Chinese) | Tagged | Leave a comment

基督教堂搬家了

Church

我最近到北京的一个教堂作礼拜。我朋友邀请我来看新盖的教堂。我发现,不仅外面和过去大不一样,里面也现代化了。

我留学的时候,来过几次。那时候,那座教堂有点破。只有一个窄门,在书店和服装店之间。如果门上的牌子没写“神爱世人”,人不会知道那是作礼拜的地方。

因为教堂位于北大和清华对面,总是有些感兴趣的大学生到这里来看。可是这次那儿有好像是面对学生的礼拜,又用英语来讲道。这些人——大约一百多——却不是来上英文课的。从吉他伴奏的音乐到其他学生的祷告,都还强调“神爱世人”,但有对年轻人更贴体的样子。

在中国,外国人和本地人没有很多机会一起做礼拜。中国基督徒少不是根本的问题,而是因为会说中国话的外国人少。我其实很感动看这么多的年级和我一样的中国朋友也想了解这些心灵的事。

站着唱歌的时候,我想,“为什么在美国,有的教堂还没有发现心灵也可以是贴体的”?我不是批评钢琴,但有的人为什么以为流行过的东西才是神圣的呢?我觉得这样当代方式的礼拜方法让人发现神也和他们的问题、需要和渴望也是贴体的。

可能是因为这些学生没带宗教文化或传统,可是还对心灵的事情有兴趣,所以就比较开明一点。

最好我想如果拿中国话来做这样的礼拜还是更好吧。

Posted in Experiences, 中文 (Chinese) | Tagged | Leave a comment

Propaganda

我昨晚把汉族和新疆的朋友召集在一起。在她们之中,我才是少数民族。

因为全国都知道新疆那里人很会跳舞,我觉得最好去可以跳舞的酒吧玩。那这个酒吧不是最流行的,可是在北京就是一个独特的地方。

这个酒吧的名字是Propaganda(意思是宣传)。标志是中国人民的红星,墙上贴得是一些五六十年代的海报。不过,位于五道口——充满留学生的地方——你很可能会碰到韩国、欧洲和美国的同志们。

Propagate me

那些新疆朋友没使我们失望。我尽量跳舞跳得和黑人一样。她们天生会跳舞。

Posted in Experiences, 中文 (Chinese) | Tagged | 4 Comments