There comes a point in every traveler’s journey when he or she has to make a distinction to keep going.
Before boarding a plane, it is necessary to part with your things—the distinction between the traveler and the souvenir. When climbing a mountain, it is necessary to let go of the camera—the distinction between getting a view and getting a shot. And after you start learning a foreign language, it is necessary to forget about ever sounding fluent—the distinction between communicating and connecting.
Here’s another distinction we all learn to live with: the difference between a country’s government and a country’s people.
That’s how people all around the world perceive America. In my travels, I have found that there is indeed a palpable force of resentment against the United States, which is felt to varying degrees by people in many places on Earth. But the term “Anti-Americanism” is not accurate.
Large groups of people resent the fact that America invaded Iraq without the permission of the UN Security Council. They resent the fact that America is the planet’s No. 1 polluter but still refuses to ratify the Kyoto Protocol. And people really, really don’t like President Bush.
But what we in America often don’t realize—without traveling overseas that is—is that people in other countries, often those very people who harbor deep hatred for America’s foreign policy, love McDonald’s. They watch re-runs of “Growing Pains” and know the name of every Seaver. They would love to take a trip to America. And sometimes they will even show you extra hospitality simply because you’re from the country they think is coolest: America.
(For the purpose of this discussion, I’m excluding those individuals such as radical Islamic fundamentalist whose hate for America—based on ideological reasons—includes a hatred for its culture and people. However I believe this group of people, despite capturing a disproportionate amount of news coverage, represents a very small minority.)
So, can we (Americans or anyone talking about a country they don’t like) learn to love the people?
I’m certainly familiar with the politics-people split. There’s a lot of things in the People’s Republic of China that I’m not pleased with. To name a few: the government’s interpretation of “free” speech, the lack of real religious liberty and still not having Indian Jones in the theater! But the people—it took me a while to figure this out—they’re just like us (Americans, etc). There are good guys, bad guys and bad guys who are good sometimes and good guys who are bad sometimes—which includes me.
More than merely accepting people in China, I really love them and their culture. You’ve got to take a stroll along the street at night to appreciate Chinese people: old couples dancing on the sidewalk, young couples kissing on their bicycles. And you won’t see their crazy side come out until Chinese New Year when young and old alike turn out to transform the night sky into the world’s largest (and loudest) fireworks display, as if to proclaim, “We invented gun powder!”
It may seem strange with so many countries claiming to be representative democracies that we must face this fork in the road—the point where we allow our perception of politics and people to part ways. But I propose that it is the only way to understand the world; it is the only way to keep going.
The reason we tend to connect the government and the people in our minds is because regimes look for legitimacy through their people’s cultural heritage. Some governments are certainly worse than others (cough, Zimbabwe). They try to attach national pride to nationalism (two very different things). And they snatch up everything sacred to a society to decorate their unholy political pin-ups.
Of course the politics-people split is not even; it’s valuing human beings above their passports. In the words of one U2 song, it’s seeing “the world in green and blue,” instead of a patchwork of political colors. And there is at least some possibility that such a point of view is exactly what our countries, governments and politics are lacking.
Here are some examples that illustrate hating the government and loving the people:

You don’t have to like Mao to love Yao.

You don’t have to like a leader who has been around since the 50s to appreciate cars that have been around since the 50s.

You don’t have to agree with an anti-Semite to enjoy a good soccer game.

Finally, you don’t have to put up with a defeated leader in Zimbabwe who is acting like a child to buy a newspaper in Zimbabwe from a child.
Got any more examples?












5 Comments
This is by far my favorite piece. I’ve learned about the politics-people split from my own life experience, but I never know how to say it so eloquently as you just did. I think the topic is along the line of stereotypes, as you’ve discussed in the “you’re so local” post.
I remember the first time we met in Beijing, you said to me, “You’re so American.” What is being “so American”? Is it cool or not? Depends on whom you ask. I suppose the real issue is that every country is associated with a stereotype, a perception in media. Sometimes it’s a flattering one, other times, discomforting. But the perception often prompts a snap judgment of who we are.
We’re simply human beings with universal feelings, desires and relationships when it comes down to everyday life. We’re shaped up by our upbringing, experiences and exposure so much more than our governments’ foreign policy. Unfortunately, most people who either criticize or idolize America (or another country) have not really lived there, which is why the politics-people split is hard to come by.
How about, “You don’t have to vote for the CPC in order to enjoy the 2008 Olympics.”
For Mainlanders, I don’t think the distinction you’ve described (e.g. Bush vs. McDonald’s) indicates a neatly understood separation between government and people (though obviously this distinction exists in certain instances). I think it is more symptomatic of a somewhat schizophrenic, love-hate-envy relationship with ‘the West,’ and America especially.
Distinguishing people from government is an American specialty – we do it naturally. But for Mainlanders, the ‘face’ of the people is inextricably connected to the face of the government. That’s why people freak out (and mis-translate/paraphrase pundits like Cafferty) when foreigners publicly criticize Chinese government policy – they are more likely to feel it as a national/cultural/racial offense, with little important distinction between the three when face is involved.
I’ve written twice on this – not with any real knowledge, but just trying to work out my own undersanding:
Why Mainlanders are taking it personally, racially, and facially – the short answer
and
What do the Olympics mean to “their China”?
I’d be curious to know what you think.
Tim, I think this post could lead to a discussion of hate crime and your excellent pictorial examples would make a good public service announcement ad
I couldn’t resist posting yet another comment, but the mention of Growing Pains cracked me up. It’s so yesterday, dude! Like … uh, leg-warmers old … haha.
Excellent and insightful as always!!!
2 Trackbacks
[...] best thing about blogs is comments. One of my recent post, “How to hate the government and love the people,” really generated a lot of buzz. (To my chagrin, that probably had more to do with the [...]
[...] not talking about the American people. I’ve written on this blog many times before about the importance of distinguishing between a country’s politics and a [...]